發新話題
打印

其實D雷曼苦主係唔係輸打贏要??

其實D雷曼苦主係唔係輸打贏要??

講真丫...宜家輸左先黎話銀行呃佢地...贏果時又唔見咁講GE??

無能白痴政府仲要用納稅人錢同呢班輸打贏要的人打官司..

講真我好討厭呢班人...大拿拿咁大筆錢買落去..宜家先黎話唔知自己買左D咩..話人地呃佢...冇野呀=.=?!
成副身家車落去都唔知自己買咩...好明顯自己都有責任啦...

好明顯呢班人當初就係因為"貪"..宜家輸左就話人

正一"輸打贏要"

TOP

我先聲明我唔係雷曼苦主 但係以我所留意所知既新聞
銀行既表達係有問題 話俾人聽低風險
咁你認為銀行方面既"專業人仕"會唔會唔知咁大風險
點講都係唔啱
你睇大部分都係上年紀既人 得罪講句轉數會慢 最容易上當
長遠睇 人總會老 希望以後既人世界會好

TOP

雷曼苦主都是因為信銀行,
結果被合法騙走畢生積蓄.

TOP

I know banks/financial institutes should not do this:

1) Call the clients for any investment products, unless the clients initiate the enquiry
2) Scan the clients' bank accts then call the clients to buy anything. Now the gov't is saying banks should separate its general banking service from its investment service.
3) Target to oldery, clients with less investment experience, low education level and knowing no English for investment products
4) Since mini-bonds are very hard to be understood, so some financial institutes may simplify mini-bonds to fixed deposit

If the financial institutes had done the mistakes, they should also take some responsibility.

I think the main problems are, the products are approved by gov't and some banks/financial institutes are selling the products improperly. Now the small clients are taking all the responsibility and result but the other governing and selling parties can escape fm the big hurt.

TOP

我覺得係

理由簡單 , 人地話無風險點解你唔問問為何利率高定期咁多 ?

TOP

發新話題