In a easy way is explain what 笛卡兒提倡 is that we understand the concept of “perfect”, but there is no way for an unperfected creature create the concept of “perfect”, so the concept of perfect must come something which is perfect!
“後世哲學家對都難以推倒笛卡兒既理論” that’s right, and there is history record to support this sentence!
And I love you said that “哲學家既理據都係由邏輯辨證出黎”
“存不在存在, 問題所在.” 過去before笛卡兒既理論, 哲學家曾常常問!
因為笛卡兒既理論, 由邏輯神證明神既存在, 同樣地證明人既存在.
因為由真.邏輯證的一定比感官更真!
“哲學家所講既神係所謂既perfect being, omnipotent, eternal 總之就唔限制於任何野”
So 神係perfect being and 創造人, 係真.
但是這證不等於在今天神既存在與人有關繫! Although, I perfect being won’t lie to us. We still don’t know what we are! Are we really human being? May be our world is using “Dharma” everything here on earth is just some interaction of a lot of spiritual energy, and we are not really “human”!
For polce’s post,
Big bang僅只是科學假定, 還是沒有證的.
I have some personal question about this idea too
“而真空卻可以有真空能量產生喱個特性,”
I don’t really understand why 真空能量可不用空間?
無邊際空間係無邊際可以係無限大同樣地可以係無限細!
“什麼都沒有”how come 有能量?
You said "產生宇宙的答案在此..." 但是你懂不懂科學從來沒有證出anyway, 但只是統計學上support!
所以 even we "假定"你係正確,即使你真係"證左",we can only say世界係爆出來, 你還沒有證出不是神用正負粒子爆世界出來.
